Abstract
To compare cardiovascular (CV) risk among gout patients initiating allopurinol vs febuxostat. Using 2002-2015 Korean National Health Insurance Service data for the entire Korean population, we conducted a cohort study on gout patients initiating allopurinol or febuxostat. The primary outcome was a composite CV end point of myocardial infarction, stroke/transient ischaemic attack, or coronary revascularization. Secondary outcomes were individual components of the primary outcome, and all-cause mortality. We used propensity score-matching with a 4:1 ratio for allopurinol and febuxostat initiators to control for confounding. Competing risk analyses were done for non-fatal outcomes accounting for deaths. We included 39 640 allopurinol initiators propensity score-matched on 9910 febuxostat initiators. The mean age was 59.1 years and 78.4% were male. The incidence rate per 100 person-years for the primary outcome was 1.89 for allopurinol and 1.84 for febuxostat initiators. The corresponding hazard ratio comparing allopurinol vs febuxostat initiators was 1.09 (95% CI: 0.90, 1.32). No significant difference was found for the secondary outcomes, including all-cause mortality (hazard ratio 0.96; 95% CI: 0.79, 1.16). Subgroup analyses limited to those at high CV risk and to equipotent-dose initiators (i.e. allopurinol ⩾300 mg/day vs febuxostat ⩾40 mg/day) showed similar results. Overall, this large Korean population-based study suggests no difference in the risk of non-fatal CV events and all-cause mortality between allopurinol and febuxostat initiators. These findings are consistent with the recent US Medicare population study, although the current study population consisted of younger Asians.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.