Abstract
Abstract Carbon dioxide (CO 2 or R744) and HFO-1234ze(E) are two promising alternatives to the currently employed high-GWP working fluids for food retail applications. In this paper, two indirect refrigeration systems using respectively R1234ze(E) and CO 2 as the primary and the secondary fluid, a R744 booster configuration with parallel compression and a R744 booster solution with R290 dedicated mechanical sub-cooling are theoretically compared with a R404A multiplex direct expansion refrigerating system (baseline). The latter serves both the LT and the MT load. All the evaluated configurations are supposed to be for commercial refrigeration technologies. The results in terms of COP reveal that both the investigated “CO 2 only” configurations have the best performance at low outdoor temperatures. On the other hand, the indirect solutions can outperform all the selected refrigerating plants at the extreme climatic conditions. In comparison with the baseline, a maximum reduction in annual electricity consumption by 6.4% and 8.9% is observed for R1234ze(E) and CO 2 based systems, respectively.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
