Abstract
Comparative assessment of the average monthly global solar radiation on horizontal surface for Owerri has been carried out with the use of five Angstrom sunshine base models. Thirty years (1992 - 2022) of average monthly global solar radiation and sunshine hours are sourced from NASA and NIMET, respectively. The sunshine-base models are evaluated with the use of geographical and metrological data of Owerri and comparison is made based on estimated statistical error indices of Mean Bias Error (MBE), Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), Mean Percentage Error (MPE), Coefficient of Determination (R2) and percentage error to assess the applicability accuracy of the models. Results obtained shows that regression equations of Fagbenle and Page models satisfied viability criterion of MBE, RMSE, and MPE being close to zero, the R2 values are reasonably close to unity and the percentage error agreed to within ± 10% of the measured average monthly global solar radiation on a horizontal surface in Owerri. Rietveld model closely followed with less prediction accuracy to those of Fagbenle and Page models, while, Glower and McCulloh and Turton models yield poor estimation of the average monthly global solar radiation on horizontal surface.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: International Journal of Research Publication and Reviews
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.