Abstract
A comparative analysis is made between the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and the multiattribute value (MAV) functions, using the MAV theory as the basis of reference, in the evaluation of transportation projects. The analysis considers three different perspectives: theoretical support, practicality, and ability to capture the decision maker's (DM) preferences. From the theoretic-behavioral standpoint, it appears that the validity of some of the assumptions of the AHP remain to be formally established, as concluded by several researchers. Secondly, the practicality of AHP was analyzed, in terms of the quantity and type of information demanded from the DM. For an even mix of ratio scale variables and nonratio scale variables the AHP requires less information than the MAV, provided the number of alternatives is less than five. Beyond this limit, the AHP requires more information than MAV. The ability to capture the decision maker's preference structure is analyzed through a case study, to which both metho...
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
