Abstract

Access to the jugular fossa pathologies (JFPs) via the transmastoid infralabyrinthine approach (TI-A) using the nonrerouting technique (removing the bone anterior and posterior to the facial nerve while leaving the nerve protected within the fallopian canal) or with the short-rerouting technique (rerouting the mastoid segment of the facial nerve anteriorly) has been described in previous studies. The objective of this study is to compare the access to Fisch class C lesions (JFPs extending or destroying the infralabyrinthine and apical compartment of the temporal bone with or without involving the carotid canal) between the nonrerouting and the short-rerouting techniques. Also, some tailored steps to the nonrerouting technique (NR-T) were outlined to enhance access to the jugular fossa (JF) as an alternative to the short-rerouting technique. Neuronavigated TI-A was performed using the nonrerouting, tailored nonrerouting, and short-rerouting techniques on both sides of 10 human head specimens. Exposed area, horizontal distance, surgical freedom, and horizontal angle were calculated using vector coordinates for nonrerouting and short-rerouting techniques. The short-rerouting technique had significantly higher values than the NR-T ( P < .01) for the exposed area (169.1 ± SD 11.5 mm 2 vs 151.0 ± SD 12.4 mm 2 ), horizontal distance (15.9 ± SD 0.6 mm vs 10.6 ± SD 0.5 mm 2 ), surgical freedom (19 650.2 ± SD 722.5 mm 2 vs 17 233.8 ± SD 631.7 mm 2 ), and horizontal angle (75.2 ± SD 5.1° vs 61.7 ± SD 4.6°). However, adding some tailored steps to the NR-T permitted comparable access to the JF. Neuronavigated TI-A with the short-rerouting technique permits wider access to the JF compared with the NR-T. However, the tailored NR-T provides comparable access to the JF and may be a better option for class C1 and selected class C2 and C3 JFPs.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call