Comparative analysis of vaginal versus robotic-assisted hysterectomy for benign indications.

Abstract

We aimed to compare perioperative outcomes of robotic-assisted hysterectomy versus vaginal hysterectomy in patients with benign gynecologic conditions, using a retrospective chart review of 240 consecutive benign hysterectomies from May 2008 to April of 2010 performed by a single surgical team at the Eisenhower Medical Center. The analysis included an equal number of cases in each group: 120 robotic-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomies and 120 total vaginal hysterectomies. Consecutive cases met the inclusion criteria of benign disease. There were no statistically significant differences related to age, body mass index, history of prior abdominal surgery, or uterine weight. Operative times in the robotic group were significantly longer by an average of 59min (p<0.001). Patients with robotic-assisted hysterectomy had clinically equivalent estimated blood loss (55.5ml vs. 84.7ml, p<0.001) and the intraoperative complication rates were 1.7% vaginal versus 0% robotic (p=0.156). There was one conversion in the vaginal group due to pelvic adhesions and no conversions in the robotic group. Length of hospital stay was 1day for both groups. The perioperative complication rates were equivalent between groups (6.7 vs. 11.7%, p=0.180), but there were more major complications in the vaginal group (0 vs. 3.3%, p=0.044). We conclude that, in a comparable group of patients, robotic-assisted hysterectomy takes longer to complete but results in fewer major complications.