Comparative analysis of two intergranular strain-based hypoplastic models through elemental and centrifuge testing

Abstract

While hypoplastic models have demonstrated accurate predictions of sand behavior under monotonic loading, their accuracy diminishes when applied to cyclic loading conditions. To address this limitation, the intergranular strain approach is used as an extension to the model. The current investigation focuses on the analysis of two variants: the original Intergranular Strain (IS) approach proposed by Niemunis and Herle (1997) and the Intergranular Strain Anisotropy (ISA) by Fuentes et al. (2019). Although both models have the same objective, they present distinct mathematical structures and therefore different repercussions on the simulations. In this study, sand Hypoplasticity is enhanced with IS and ISA, and employed to simulate a series of experimental tests conducted on Fontainebleau sand. These tests encompass isotropic compression, drained monotonic triaxial, and undrained cyclic triaxial tests, while considering different initial densities and test characteristics. Furthermore, the calibrated models were applied to simulate a series of centrifuge tests, involving a pile embedded in the same sand, which is subjected to various episodes of monotonic and cyclic lateral loading. A comparison and discussion of the similarities and differences in elemental and finite element predictions, arising from the two intergranular strain formulations is presented.