Comparative analysis of two different field tests; assessment of aerobic capacity according to heart rate responses in amputee football players

Abstract

Aerobic field tests have not been specifically studied in amputee populations. The purpose of this study was to compare values for aerobic performance in two different field tests, the 1-Mile Run Test (1-MRT) and the Cooper Test (CT), according to heart rate (HR) responses in amputee footballers. Aerobic capacities of 18 male volunteers playing amputee football (mean age=30.33±5.70 years) were evaluated by the 1-MRT and the CT. The Polar Team2Pro device was used for HR measurement. There were significant differences between the 1MRT and the CT in terms of the %HRmax in fourth quarter of tests, the HRave and the average % HRmax. The perceived exertions in fourth quarter, the estimated VO2max, the HRave, % HRmax in fourth quarter and the average % HRmax during the 1-MRT were significantly higher than those during the CT (p < 0.05). However, VAS scores of the subjects during the 1-CT were significantly higher than those during the MRT (p < 0.05). When analysing capability to perform vigorous exercise than sub-maximal exercise over a short duration, the 1-MRT elicited greater HR responses than the CT. Therefore, the 1-MRT should be preferred over the CT for aerobic fitness testing in amputee footballers.