Comparative Analysis of Treatment of Allergic Rhinitis Utilizing Azelastine and Fluticasone

Abstract

The present study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of topical therapy in patients with allergic rhinitis by fluticasone propionate as well as corticosteroid propionate in conjunction with fluticasone propionate alone. The study aims to evaluate the efficacy of topical treatment on people with Allergic Rhinits (AR). The medicines propionate fluticasone and antihistamine corticosteroids and propionate fluticasone alone were administered to patients with allergic rhinitis. AR was tested. A comparison of the effectiveness of topical treatment with Azelastine of fluticasone propionate and Fluticasone to suppress Allergic Rhinitis symptoms was assessed. Significant disruptions in the quality of living, health as well as function are linked with potentially severe allergic rhinitis. The most prevalent form of recurrent rhinitis is allergic rhinitis, impacting between 10 and 20% of the world population. Statistics show that there is an exponential increase in this condition. The common signs of human rhinorrhea, sneezing, coughing, respiratory inflammation, vomiting and weeping of skin, palatal scratching and ear coughing are considerably higher(* P=.001). The average symptom value (84,14 per cent) was significantly minimised during the test by Fluticasone propionate nasal spray. The intensity of complication decreased substantially by the administration of fluticasone propionate + azelastine hydrochloride nasal spray often functions (91.16 per cent). A mixture of Fluticasone propionate and Azelastine hydrochloride is better than Fluticasone propionate nasal spray to relieve the reactions of Allergic Rhinitis.