Abstract

In this single-center prospective study of 20 patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis (HD), we compared the therapeutic effects of medium cut-off (MCO) and high flux (HF) dialyzers using metabolomics and proteomics. A consecutive dialyzer membrane was used for 15-week study periods: 1st HF dialyzer, MCO dialyzer, 2nd HF dialyzer, for 5 weeks respectively. 1H-nuclear magnetic resonance was used to identify the metabolites and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS) analysis was used to identify proteins. To compare the effects of the HF and MCO dialyzers, orthogonal projection to latent structure discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA) was performed. OPLS-DA showed that metabolite characteristics could be significantly classified by 1st HF and MCO dialyzers. The Pre-HD metabolites with variable importance in projection scores ≥ 1.0 in both 1st HF versus MCO and MCO versus 2nd HF were succinate, glutamate, and histidine. The pre-HD levels of succinate and histidine were significantly lower, while those of glutamate were significantly higher in MCO period than in the HF period. OPLS-DA of the proteome also substantially separated 1st HF and MCO periods. Plasma pre-HD levels of fibronectin 1 were significantly higher, and those of complement component 4B and retinol-binding protein 4 were significantly lower in MCO than in the 1st HF period. Interestingly, as per Ingenuity Pathway Analysis, an increase in epithelial cell proliferation and a decrease in endothelial cell apoptosis occurred during the MCO period. Overall, our results suggest that the use of MCO dialyzers results in characteristic metabolomics and proteomics profiles during HD compared with HF dialyzers, which might be related to oxidative stress, insulin resistance, complement-coagulation axis, inflammation, and nutrition.

Highlights

  • In this single-center prospective study of 20 patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis (HD), we compared the therapeutic effects of medium cut-off (MCO) and high flux (HF) dialyzers using metabolomics and proteomics

  • Different dialyzer membranes were used for 3 consecutive periods of 5 weeks: 1st HF dialyzer, MCO dialyzer, and 2nd HF dialyzer, respectively (Fig. 1)

  • The proteomic and metabolomic profiles, as per the orthogonal projection to latent structure discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA) score scatter plots from the 1H nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectra and LC–mass spectrometry (MS)/MS results of pre-dialysis samples obtained from subjects in the 1st HF and MCO dialyzer periods showed substantial differences

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In this single-center prospective study of 20 patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis (HD), we compared the therapeutic effects of medium cut-off (MCO) and high flux (HF) dialyzers using metabolomics and proteomics. HF dialysis does not present a clear advantage in terms of mortality over low-flux dialysis; the survival benefits of HF dialysis were only shown in patients with diabetes or ­hypoalbuminemia[5] Another dialysis modality, hemodiafiltration (HDF) has higher efficiency in removing middle molecules than HD using an HF membrane because HDF can enhance the convection effect during ­dialysis[6]. MCO dialyzers are associated with increased convective transport owing to enhanced internal filtration Because of these characteristics, MCO dialyzers are associated with a higher large middle molecule removal rate compared to that obtained with HD using an HF dialyzer or H­ DF8,9. The aim of this study was to analyze the therapeutic effects and define the characteristics of MCO dialyzers compared to those of HF dialyzers using metabolomics and proteomics

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call