Abstract
Literature regarding orbital fractures demonstrates that untreated defects of a critical size can lead to complications such as enophthalmos, hypoglobus, or diplopia. Therefore, accurate estimation of fracture surface area and volume is crucial when determining the need for surgical correction. However, there is no universally accepted method for measuring fracture dimensions. The purpose of this study was to compare multiple techniques for quantifying orbital fracture surface area and herniation volume to determine differences in estimation.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
