Comparative analysis of surgical outcomes in children with type 3 and type 4 lateral physeal condylar humerus fractures in China: Closed Reduction-PerCutaneous Pinning (CRPP) vs. Open Reduction-Internal Fixation (ORIF)

Abstract

BackgroundLateral physeal condylar humerus fractures in pediatric patients aged 1–13 rank as the second most common elbow injury, occurring with a frequency ranging from 5% to 16.8%. There exists an ongoing debate regarding the surgical management of these fractures. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of Open Reduction and Internal Fixation (ORIF) and Closed Reduction and Percutaneous Pinning (CRPP) as suitable surgical treatments for displaced unstable fractures of the lateral condyle physeal humerus in children. The comparison encompasses the results of ORIF and CRPP, alongside clinical and radiographic outcomes and complication rates. MethodA retrospective review was conducted at the Department of Orthopedic Surgery in the research hospital. A cohort of 27 patients treated between 2016 and 2023 were analyzed, 19 patients meeting inclusion criteria. The fracture pattern and degree of displacement were assessed, with specialized radiologists, doctors, and surgeons in agreement. Among the patients, 11 underwent CRPP 7 type 3and 4 type 2, while 16 received ORIF 12 type 4 and 4 type 5. Data collection included fracture type, surgical method, operation time, pre and post-operative displacement, casting period, bone union condition, follow-up records, range of motion, complications, delayed union, lateral spurring, and pin removal records. ResultsFor CRPP, the mean time for pin removal was 5.42 weeks, with excellent bone union and an average operation time of 34.57 min. Criteria of Hardacre showed 28.57% of cases as good and 71.42% as excellent. Similarly, ORIF demonstrated a mean operation time of 42.5 min, with the fracture healing within 5.33 weeks and the pin being removed after 15 days on average. Criteria of Hardacre indicated 25% of cases as good and 75% as excellent. Both groups showed satisfactory outcomes, with no complications such as osteomyelitis, nonunion, malunion, delayed union, myositis ossificans, physeal growth arrest, tardy ulnar nerve palsy, cubitus valgus, or varus, and no cases requiring re-surgery. ConclusionBoth CRPP and ORIF are effective surgical methods for treating lateral physeal condylar humeral fractures (types 3 and 4 according to the Song classification) in children, demonstrating satisfactory outcomes. Notably, regardless of displacement (2 mm and >2 mm), both methods yield similar results, albeit with CRPP offering the advantage of avoiding incisions. Overall, both procedures are safe, with favorable bone healing outcomes.