Abstract
The communication method using sign language is very efficient considering that the speed of information delivery is closer to verbal communication (speaking) compared to writing or typing. Because of this, sign language is often used by people who are deaf, speech impaired, and normal people to communicate. To make sign language translation easier, a system is needed to translate symbols formed from hand movements (in the form of images) into text or sound. This study aims to compare performance such as accuracy and computation time of Support Vector Machine (SVM) and K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN) with Pyramidal Histogram of Gradient (PHOG) for feature extraction, to know which one is better at recognizing sign language. Yield, both combined methods PHOG-SVM and PHOG-KNN can recognize images from hand movements that form certain symbols. The system built using the SVM classification produces the highest accuracy of 82% at PHOG level 3, while the system built with the KNN classification produces the highest accuracy of 78% at PHOG level 2. The total computation time of the fastest training and testing by the SVM model is 236.53 seconds at PHOG level 3, while the KNN model is 78.27 seconds at PHOG level 3. In terms of accuracy, PHOG-SVM is better, but in terms of computation time, PHOG-KNN takes the place.
Highlights
Sign language is one of several communication methods that can be used by deaf and mute persons as well as normal people to communicate
This study aims to compare performance such as accuracy and computation time of Support Vector Machine (SVM) and K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN) with Pyramidal Histogram of Gradient (PHOG) for feature extraction, to know which one is better at recognizing sign language
The second factor is that previous research did not explicitly mention the SVM configuration used, so in this study, the authors tried several configurations and the best results were obtained on the SVM configuration with a polynomial kernel, degree 3, and tolerance 0.00001
Summary
Sign language is one of several communication methods that can be used by deaf and mute persons as well as normal people to communicate. The method of communication using sign language is very efficient considering that the speed of information delivery is closer to verbal communication (speaking) compared to writing or typing. To make sign language translation easier, a system is needed to translate symbols formed from hand movements (in the form of images) into text or sound. Research on sign language recognition using these methods has been conducted [1] with an accuracy of up to 86%. This study aims to compare performance such as accuracy and computation time of SVM and KNN with PHOG for feature extraction and the same dataset like [1] to find out which one is better at recognizing sign language
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Matrix : Jurnal Manajemen Teknologi dan Informatika
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.