Abstract
The fitting analysis of soil‐water characteristic curve (SWCC) is the foundation of engineering properties of unsaturated soils. The purpose of this paper is to explore the differences of fitting effects between different fractal and empirical models as well as the effect of residual water content θr on the model fitting. The experimental SWCCs of Hunan clay at different initial dry densities are measured by pressure plate instrument, and then they are fitted by fractal and empirical models. The effect of the limit of θr on the fitting results is analyzed by comparing the results of indoor evaporation test. The results show that within the measured data point range, fractal model II‐2 and van Genuchten model (VG model) have the best fitting effect, fractal models I and II‐1 take the second place, and the fitting effect of Gardner model is the worst. When the matrix suction is more than the measured data, the fitting accuracy of the model is poor. For the model with θr, reasonable limit range of θr can only improve the fitting accuracy of the model to a certain extent. For the fractal model, the fitting accuracy of the model can be improved effectively when θr is considered. Furthermore, the difference of fractal dimension and air‐entry value in various fractal models are also discussed in this paper.
Highlights
Out of various soil-water characteristic curve (SWCC) models available in the literature, classical models such as the Gardner model, the van Genuchten (VG) model, and the Fredlund–Xing (FX) model are often widely used by researchers
Chen and Gong [23] compared the fitting effects of five SWCC models, indicating that the modified Gardner model has the best performance
Zhang et al [24] found that both VG model and FX model can accurately describe SWCC of Jiaohe soil over the complete range of matrix suction. e above models are in the simple from and are convenient to implement
Summary
If matrix suction ψ is less than ψa, the soil sample is assumed to be fully saturated. En, the fractal SWCC model is expressed as follows:. Van Genuchten [7] presented a SWCC model with three parameters, and its expression is as follows:. Where a, m, and p are fitting parameters, a is related to the air-entry value, m is related to the pore size distribution of soil, and p is the parameter related to m as p 1 − 1/m
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
