Comparative analysis of safety and effect of minimally invasive esophageal cancer radical resection and conventional thoracotomy for esophageal cancer

Abstract

【Abstract】Objective: To compare the clinical effects of minimally invasive esophageal cancer radical resection and traditional esophageal cancer radical resection.Methods: 200 cases of esophageal cancer radical resection were performed from July 2014 to July 2017 in our hospital.The cases were divided into experimental group and control group, 82 cases in the experimental group and 118 cases in the control group.The experimental group was treated with minimally invasive esophageal cancer radical surgery, and the control group was treated with conventional thoracotomy.Record the comparison between the two groups (1) surgical conditions, including the time of surgery, intraoperative blood loss, hospitalization time; (2) the number of lymph nodes cleaned; (3) the postoperative control group used conventional thoracotomy, including lung lesions, anastomotic fistula / narrow.RESULTS: The parameters of operation time, intraoperative blood loss, hospitalization time, and number of lymph nodes cleaned in the experimental group were lower than those in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (p<0.05). In addition to pulmonary infection (p<0.05), There was no significant difference in the incidence of other complications between the experimental group and the control group (p>0.05).Conclusion: Minimally invasive esophageal cancer radical resection and conventional thoracotomy have good clinical effects in the treatment of esophageal cancer. Minimally invasive esophageal cancer radical surgery can effectively reduce intraoperative trauma and postoperative reaction, which is worthy of popularization and application.