Comparative analysis of resistance characteristics of composite sleeper and concrete sleeper in ballast bed

Abstract

A composite sleeper has a similar shape, stiffness, and weight to that of an existing wood sleeper with additional benefits including excellent durability, extended design life like a prestressed concrete sleeper, environmentally friendliness, and cost effectiveness. Therefore, in some cases, composite sleepers are considered as an alternative for wooden or concrete sleepers. In this study, the longitudinal- and lateral-displacement resistance changes of the fiber reinforced foamed urethane (FFU) composite sleepers and the concrete sleepers in ballast beds were tested. The application conditions of the composite sleeper in a ballast bed were analyzed. The results show that the resistance of the composite sleeper changed more sharply, and its value was greater than that of the concrete sleeper during the initial stage of their displacements. The longitudinal and lateral resistance of the composite sleeper was lower than that of the concrete sleeper with an increase in displacement (at 2 mm, longitudinal: 41.35% of the concrete sleeper, lateral: 35.64% of the concrete sleeper). Using the discrete element method (DEM), it was found that when the composite sleeper moves, the ballast around it may ‘rebound.’ The force and its transfer of the ballast near the displacement end of the concrete sleeper was an upward arc, while that of the composite sleeper was a downward arc. The ballast on the side of the concrete sleeper moved upward (tending to be horizontal) along the lateral-displacement direction of the sleeper, while that of the composite sleeper moved downward (tending to be vertical).