Comparative analysis of reduced toxicity conditioning regimens between fludarabine plus melphalan and fludarabine plus busulfex in adult patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Abstract

Reduced-toxicity conditioning (RTC) regimens aim to mitigate regimen-related toxicity while maintaining anti-leukemic efficacy in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). We assessed outcomes of RTC regimens utilizing melphalan versus intravenous busulfan combined with fludarabine in adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) patients. A retrospective analysis was conducted with 149 consecutive adult ALL patients (median age 51, range 18-60) in remission undergoing allo-HSCT. Patients received either fludarabine 150 mg/BSA plus 2 days of melphalan 70 mg/BSA (FM140, n = 76) from 2009 to 2015 or fludarabine plus 3 days of busulfan 3.2 mg/kg (FB9.6, n = 73) from 2016 to 2021. At 5 years post-HSCT, FM140 demonstrated superior disease-free survival (53.4% vs. 30.5%, p = 0.007) and lower cumulative relapse (27.4% vs. 46.8%, p = 0.026) than FB9.6. Five-year overall survival and non-relapse mortality did not significantly differ. FM140 exhibited a higher incidence of acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) grades II-IV (49.3% vs. 30.3%, p = 0.016), though rates of acute GVHD grades III-IV and chronic GVHD were similar. Multivariate analysis identified Philadelphia chromosome and minimal residual disease positive status, and FB9.6 conditioning as predictors of increased relapse and poorer disease-free survival. FM140 RTC regimen displayed significantly reduced relapse and superior disease-free survival compared to FB9.6 in ALL patients undergoing allo-HSCT, highlighting its current clinical utility.