Abstract
Abstract. For the educational worker, predicting students grades and having a deep understanding of students levels is quite important to improve their teaching methods. Fortunately, there have been several research to predict students grades in applying different models, such as Matrix Factorization (MF) and Graph Convolutional Networks (GCNs). This essay is talking about comparing two different models, MF and GCNs, which are going to exhibit the difference between them. By comparing their performance in predictive accuracy, interpretability, and computational efficiency, people can identify their strengths and areas for improvement. In this essay, the advantages and disadvantages of the two models will be listed and their performance will be compared. Therefore, in this context, this essay will introduce two models first, then show their performance in different experiences from past research and compare their results. As a result, MF shows a better performance in handling large-scale sparse datasets and providing meaningful interpretations, whereas GCNs are good at capturing complex dependencies and integrating multiple data sources.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.