Abstract

Divergent selection and adaptive divergence can increase phenotypic diversification amongst populations and lineages. Yet adaptive divergence between different environments, habitats or niches does not occur in all lineages. For example, the colonization of freshwater environments by ancestral marine species has triggered adaptive radiation and phenotypic diversification in some taxa but not in others. Studying closely related lineages differing in their ability to diversify is an excellent means of understanding the factors promoting and constraining adaptive evolution. A well-known example of the evolution of increased phenotypic diversification following freshwater colonization is the three-spined stickleback. Two closely related stickleback lineages, the Pacific Ocean and the Japan Sea occur in Japan. However, Japanese freshwater stickleback populations are derived from the Pacific Ocean lineage only, suggesting the Japan Sea lineage is unable to colonize freshwater. Using stable isotope data and trophic morphology, we first show higher rates of phenotypic and ecological diversification between marine and freshwater populations within the Pacific Ocean lineage, confirming adaptive divergence has occurred between the two lineages and within the Pacific Ocean lineage but not in the Japan Sea lineage. We further identified consistent divergence in diet and foraging behaviour between marine forms from each lineage, confirming Pacific Ocean marine sticklebacks, from which all Japanese freshwater populations are derived, are better adapted to freshwater environments than Japan Sea sticklebacks. We suggest adaptive divergence between ancestral marine populations may have played a role in constraining phenotypic diversification and adaptive evolution in Japanese sticklebacks.

Highlights

  • Colonisation of new environments can lead to adaptive divergence, the evolution of reproductive isolation and progression towards speciation within evolutionary lineages [1,2,3]

  • We suggest that if adaptive divergence between marine and freshwater habitats occurred ancestrally in the Pacific Ocean lineage but not the Japan Sea lineage, this may have played a role in constraining phenotypic diversification

  • All freshwater populations occurred within the Pacific Ocean clade (Fig. 1c; Figure S2 in File S1), which is consistent with our previous findings that freshwater colonization occurs in the Pacific Ocean clade only [21]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Colonisation of new environments can lead to adaptive divergence, the evolution of reproductive isolation and progression towards speciation within evolutionary lineages [1,2,3]. Many potential factors may constrain phenotypic diversification and adaptive divergence [5] Intrinsic factors such as differences in rate of dispersion and adaption to novel niche space can shape both colonisation history and rates of evolutionary diversification. The genetic basis of adaptation is important; adaptation from standing genetic variation is more rapid than that from de novo mutations [8] Extrinsic factors such as competition with earlier colonizers may prevent lineages from establishing [5, 9, 10]. Comparative analyses of genetic and phenotypic variation between lineages undergoing different rates of adaptive divergence and phenotypic diversification may help us better understand these constraints

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call