Abstract

ABSTRACT Accurate streamflow simulation is crucial for effective hydrological management, especially in regions like the upper Baro watershed, Ethiopia, where data scarcity challenges conventional modeling approaches. This study evaluates the efficacy of three hydrological models: the Hydrologic Engineering Center's Hydrologic Modeling System (HEC-HMS), artificial neural network (ANN), and support vector regression (SVR) in predicting runoff. Using data from 2000 to 2016, the analysis focused on various performance metrics such as the Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE), root mean square error (RMSE), and coefficient of determination (R2). The results indicated that the ANN model significantly outperformed the others, achieving an NSE of 0.98, RMSE of 24 m3/s, and R2 of 0.99. In comparison, the HEC-HMS model yielded an NSE of 0.85, RMSE of 113.4 m3/s, and R2 of 0.89, while the SVR model displayed an NSE of 0.97, RMSE of 27 m3/s, and R2 of 0.99. These findings highlight the superior performance of ANN in regions with limited hydrological data, suggesting its potential as a reliable alternative to traditional physical models. By demonstrating the efficacy of machine learning models, this research facilitates the way for innovative approaches to water resource management, offering valuable insights for policymakers and practitioners.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.