Comparative Analysis of Gully Morphology Extraction Suitability Using Unmanned Aerial Vehicle and Google Earth Imagery

Abstract

Gully erosion is considered to be a highly destructive form of soil erosion, often leading to the occurrence of natural calamities like landslides and mudslides. Remote sensing images have been extensively utilized in gully erosion research, and the suitability of extracting gully morphology parameters in various topographic regions needs to be clarified. Based on field measurements, this paper focuses on two widely used high-resolution remote sensing images: Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) and Google Earth (GE) imagery. It systematically examines the accuracy of gully morphological characteristic extraction using remote sensing in two regions with different terrain characteristics. The results show the following: (1) Compared to interpreting wide gullies with unclear shoulder lines, centimeter-level UAV imagery is more suitable for interpreting narrow gullies with clear shoulder lines. Conversely, the interpretability of sub-meter-level GE imagery is exactly the opposite. (2) The error in interpreting gully head points (GHPs) based on UAV images is less than 1 m, while the errors in gully length (GL), width (GW), perimeter (GP) and area (GA) are all below 3%, and these errors are hardly affected by gully morphology. (3) The error of GHPs based on GE images is concentrated within the range of 1–3 m. Meanwhile, the errors associated with GL, GP and GA are less than 10%. Conversely, the error of GW exceeds 11%. Furthermore, the aforementioned errors tend to increase as the gully width decreases and the complexity of the gully shoulder line increases. These findings shed light on the suitability of two commonly used remote sensing images for gully morphology extraction and provide valuable guidance for image selection in future research endeavors in this field.