Abstract
Spaceborne LiDAR altimetry has been demonstrated to be an essential source of data for the estimation and monitoring of inland water level variations. In this study, water level estimates from the Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI) were validated against in situ gauge station records over Lake Geneva for the period between April 2019 and September 2020. The performances of the first and second releases (V1 and V2, respectively) of the GEDI data products were compared, and the effects on the accuracy of the instrumental and environmental factors were analyzed in order to discern the most accurate GEDI acquisitions. The respective influences of five parameters were analyzed in this study: (1) the signal-over-noise ratio (SNR); (2) the width of the water surface peak within the waveform (gwidth); (3) the amplitude of the water surface peak within the waveform (A); (4) the viewing angle of GEDI (VA); and (5) the acquiring beam. Results indicated that all these factors, except the acquiring beam, had an effect on the accuracy of GEDI elevations. Nonetheless, using VA as a filtering criterion was demonstrated to be the best compromise between retained shot count and water level estimation accuracy. Indeed, by choosing the shots with a VA ≤ 3.5°, 74.6% of the shots (after an initial filter) were retained with accuracies similar to choosing A > 400 (46.2% retained shots), SNR > 15 dB (63.3% retained shots), or gwidth < 10 bins (46.5% of retained shots). Finally, the comparison between V1 and V2 elevations showed that V2, overall, provided elevations with a more constant, but higher, bias and fewer deviations to the in situ data than V1. Indeed, by choosing GEDI shots with VA ≤ 3.5°, the unbiased RMSE (ubRMSE) of GEDI elevations was 27.1 cm with V2 (r = 0.66) and 42.8 cm with V1 (r = 0.34). Results also show that the accuracy of GEDI (ubRMSE) does not seem to depend on the beam number and GEDI acquisition dates for the most accurate GEDI acquisitions (VA ≤ 3.5°). Regarding the bias, a higher value was observed with V2, but with lower variability (54 cm) in comparison to V1 (35 cm). Finally, the bias showed a slight dependence on beam GEDI number and strong dependence on GEDI dates.
Highlights
The results showed that the correlation between unbiased root mean squared error (RMSE) (ubRMSE) and viewing angle (VA) were significantly lower for V2 in comparison to V1
The results showed that the second release (V2) of the Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI) data products is more precise than V1 in terms of elevation estimation, and the data
The analysis results showed that the best criterion to filter less accurate GEDI waveforms In this study, GEDI’s ability to measure and monitor water levels was assessed against is based on the viewing angle (VA)
Summary
In the last couple of decades, active remote sensing technologies such as radar or. LiDAR based sensors have become an essential source of information for the monitoring of inland water body levels due to their validated high accuracies [1,2,3,4,5,6] and as a way to fill-in for the ever-decreasing water-level gauge stations that has been reported worldwide [7,8]. We are interested in evaluating the accuracy of the recently launched spaceborne-based full-waveform LiDAR sensor, the Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI) on board the International Space Station (ISS). GEDI, which became operational in 2019, is equipped with three 1064 nm lasers with a pulse repetition frequency (PRF) of Remote Sens. One of the lasers’ power is split in two, and are hereafter referred to as coverage lasers, while the remaining two operate at full power, hereafter referred to as power lasers
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
