Abstract
¬This paper presents the role and significance of the estimation of programming sizes when estimating the execution of programming exercises and in assessing exertion for new programming undertakings. ¬is paper shows the comparative analysis of four standard programming estimating techniques (the Albrecht/IFPUG, MkII FPA, NESMA, and COSMIC method) that have professed to be practical size estimation techniques and look at the genuine idea of their size scales. ¬is paper identifies find that sizes delivered by the Albrecht/IFPUG and MkII FPA and NESMA techniques are entirely a size of standard (improvement) exertion. Only the COSMIC method gives a genuine proportion of practical size and therefore the most appropriate method for execution examinations crosswise over undertakings utilizing diverse advancements.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Journal of Independent Studies and Research Computing
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
