Comparative analysis of fixed-pitch and variable-pitch control systems for multirotor drones: Acoustic characteristics and rotor phase control

Abstract

In this study, the aerodynamic and aeroacoustic characteristics of multirotor electric vertical take-off and landing aircraft in hovering and forward flight are compared using two representative control methods: fixed-pitch control and variable-pitch control (i.e., revolution per minute (RPM) control and collective pitch control). To this end, a comprehensive multirotor noise assessment framework is used to predict the aerodynamics and noise of multirotors controlled by RPM and collective pitch. High-resolution time–frequency analysis is used to clarify the differences in noise spectral characteristics. The findings indicate that blade passage frequency characteristics vary significantly depending on the control method. The phase differences between the rotors of variable-pitch control remain constant irrespective of disturbances or attitude control. In other words, the frequencies of the tone noise do not exhibit short-periodic modulation, unlike those of RPM-controlled multirotor. Additionally, the aeroacoustic characteristics of fixed-pitch and variable-pitch controlled multirotor in response to wind velocity fluctuation are investigated by considering the direction of noise radiation and interference effects. The impact of the turbulent kinetic energy of wind on the noise characteristics is examined by quantifying the noise components associated with aerodynamic unsteadiness in flight. Furthermore, the rotor phase control method can be applied to reduce noise in both control methods. The optimization of rotor phases reduces tone noise significantly at the target observer point without causing aerodynamic losses in variable-pitch controlled multirotor. In contrast, the reduction in tone noise remains relatively limited for fixed-pitch controlled multirotor, as the rotor phase differences are not maintained.