Abstract

Gunshot detection technology (GDT) has been increasingly adopted by law enforcement agencies to tackle the problem of underreporting of crime via 911 calls for service, which undoubtedly affects the quality of crime mapping and spatial analysis. This article investigates the spatial and temporal patterns of gun violence by comparing data collected from GDT and 911 calls in Louisville, Kentucky. We applied hot spot mapping, near repeat diagnosis, and spatial regression approaches to the analysis of gunshot incidents and their associated neighborhood characteristics. We observed significant discrepancies between GDT data and 911 calls for service, which indicate possible underreporting of firearm discharge in 911 call data. The near repeat analysis suggests an increased risk of gunshots in nearby locations following an initial event. Results of spatial regression models validate the hypothesis of spatial dependence in frequencies of gunshot incidents and crime underreporting across neighborhoods in the study area, both of which are positively associated with proportions of African American residents, who are less likely to report a gunshot. This article adds to a growing body of research on GDT and its benefits for law enforcement activity. Findings from this research not only provide new insights into the spatiotemporal aspects of gun violence in urban areas but also shed light on the issue of underreporting of gun violence.

Highlights

  • The United States is experiencing a decades-long epidemic of gun violence dating back to the 1970s [1]

  • The Louisville Metro Police Department (LMPD) dispatch data contained 729 Gunshot detection technology (GDT) events and 387 calls for service for gunshots fired in the study area

  • Of the 729 GDT events recorded, only 85 events had a corresponding call for service within a 1-hour window of the GDT event

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The United States is experiencing a decades-long epidemic of gun violence dating back to the 1970s [1]. More than 30,000 people die each year from gun violence, with approximately one-third attributed to homicide and two-thirds to suicide, and nearly 70,000 more are non-fatally injured [2,3,4]. The risk of this violence is disproportionately distributed among different demographic groups and across geographic entities at different levels. The mortality rate incurred by gun violence varies by state from as low as 3.4/100,000 in Massachusetts to 23.3/100,000 in Alaska [3]. Scholars have long observed that criminal incidents, especially violent crime, are highly concentrated in disadvantaged inner-city neighborhoods, which are disproportionately resided by minority and low-income residents [5,6,7]

Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.