Comparative Analysis of Early Versus Late Feeding Post-percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Tube Placement: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Abstract

In clinical practice, tube feedings have been delayed after the percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube placement. Previous studies, including a meta-analysis in 2008, have shown that it is safe to start tube feeding ≤ 4h of PEG tube placement. However, it is still a common practice to delay the initiation of tube feeding up to 24h after PEG tube placement. We have performed an updated analysis of studies comparing early versus delayed tube feedings following PEG placement. Major databases like PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science were searched in June 2022 for randomized controlled trial (RCT) studies reporting on comparative outcomes with early (< or = 4h) versus delayed (> 4h) feeding after PEG tube placement in adult patients. The primary outcomes in our study include complication rates and mortality rates within 72h of the procedure. The outcomes were reported as pooled odds ratio (95% confidence interval (CI) (Moole et al. in Indian J Gastroenterol. 35:323-330, 2016), p value, I2 values). A total of 212 individuals in the early feeding group and 215 individuals in the late feeding group were analyzed from six studies. The pooled odds ratio of total complication events between early and late feed groups was 0.86 (CI 0.51-1.45, p = 0.58). The pooled odds ratio of fever, vomiting, and local infection was 0.94 (CI 0.186-4.74, p = 0.94), 1.0 (CI 0.38-2.65, p = 0.9), and 1.25 (0.36-4.3, p = 0.72), respectively, between early and late feeding post-PEG tube placement. In conclusion, this meta-analysis confirms that early feeding ≤ 4h after PEG placement does not increase the odds of poor outcomes or mortality, and it is a well-tolerated, safe, and effective alternative to delayed feeding. Furthermore, early feeding may decrease hospital stays and healthcare costs.