Abstract

BackgroundThe analysis of single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNAseq) data plays an important role in understanding the intrinsic and extrinsic cellular processes in biological and biomedical research. One significant effort in this area is the detection of differentially expressed (DE) genes. scRNAseq data, however, are highly heterogeneous and have a large number of zero counts, which introduces challenges in detecting DE genes. Addressing these challenges requires employing new approaches beyond the conventional ones, which are based on a nonzero difference in average expression. Several methods have been developed for differential gene expression analysis of scRNAseq data. To provide guidance on choosing an appropriate tool or developing a new one, it is necessary to evaluate and compare the performance of differential gene expression analysis methods for scRNAseq data.ResultsIn this study, we conducted a comprehensive evaluation of the performance of eleven differential gene expression analysis software tools, which are designed for scRNAseq data or can be applied to them. We used simulated and real data to evaluate the accuracy and precision of detection. Using simulated data, we investigated the effect of sample size on the detection accuracy of the tools. Using real data, we examined the agreement among the tools in identifying DE genes, the run time of the tools, and the biological relevance of the detected DE genes.ConclusionsIn general, agreement among the tools in calling DE genes is not high. There is a trade-off between true-positive rates and the precision of calling DE genes. Methods with higher true positive rates tend to show low precision due to their introducing false positives, whereas methods with high precision show low true positive rates due to identifying few DE genes. We observed that current methods designed for scRNAseq data do not tend to show better performance compared to methods designed for bulk RNAseq data. Data multimodality and abundance of zero read counts are the main characteristics of scRNAseq data, which play important roles in the performance of differential gene expression analysis methods and need to be considered in terms of the development of new methods.

Highlights

  • The analysis of single-cell RNA sequencing data plays an important role in understanding the intrinsic and extrinsic cellular processes in biological and biomedical research

  • DEsingle and SigEMD performed the best in terms of accuracy and F1 score since they identified high true positives (TPs) and did not introduce many False positive (FP)

  • We defined true detected differentially expressed (DE) genes as DE genes that are called by the tools and are among the 1000 gold standard DE genes

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The analysis of single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNAseq) data plays an important role in understanding the intrinsic and extrinsic cellular processes in biological and biomedical research. ScRNAseq data, are highly heterogeneous and have a large number of zero counts, which introduces challenges in detecting DE genes Addressing these challenges requires employing new approaches beyond the conventional ones, which are based on a nonzero difference in average expression. Tools developed for differential gene expression analysis on bulk RNAseq data, such as DESeq [11] and edgeR [12], can be applied to single-cell data [11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20]. Single-cell RNAseq (scRNAseq) data, have different characteristics from those of bulk RNAseq data that require the use of a new differential expression analysis definition, beyond the conventional definition of a nonzero difference in average expression. The heterogeneity within and between cell populations manifests major challenges to the differential gene expression analysis in scRNAseq data

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call