Abstract

Finding the genome of new species remains as one of the most crucial tasks in molecular biology. To achieve that end, de novo sequence assembly feeds from the vast amount of data provided by Next-Generation Sequencing technology. Therefore, genome assemblers demand a high amount of computational resources, and parallel implementations of those assemblers are readily available. This paper presents a comparison of three well-known de novo genome assemblers: Velvet, ABySS and SOAPdenovo, all of them using de Bruijn graphs and having a parallel implementation. We based our analysis on parallel execution time, scalability, quality of assembly, and sensitivity to the choice of a critical parameter (k- mer size). We found one of the tools clearly stands out for providing faster execution time and better quality in the output. Also, all assemblers are mildly sensitive to the choice of k-mer size and they all show limited scalability. We expect the findings of this paper provide a guide to the development of new algorithms and tools for scalable parallel genome sequence assemblers.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call