Abstract

The paper presents a first comparative analysis of emission formation phenomena of three different bioliquids, derived from low cost waste streams while utilizing the same, gas turbine based experimental setup. A consistent and unbiased comparison is ensured by the application of the same experimental test rig featuring only those minor fuel based adaptions, which are required to ensure most favourable operation of each of the analysed fuels. This provides the direct comparative data between combustion performance of liquefied wood, obtained through solvolysis process, glycerol and waste liquor from nanocellulose production that were previously tested in various combustion systems, hence making direct evaluation of fuel’s suitability difficult. The study focuses on analysis of all key thermodynamic parameters, significant emission species covering CO, NOx, HC particulate matter and soot as well as identification of underlying phenomena for observed emission trends. These indicate that for NOx emissions a good correlation exists to stoichiometric ratio of the fuels, where low stoichiometric ratio results in lower NOx emissions, provided oxygen content is the main diluent and fuel bound nitrogen is low. As all tested fuels feature oxygen content above 43%, this enables a large improvement in NOx – CO trade off, as CO emissions are reducing with higher peak combustion temperatures while minimally increasing NOx emissions. Similar observations are made for particulate matter – NOx trade off, however the ash content significantly impacts the particulate matter emission, hence reducing the potential for clean combustion of waste liquor. In the case of glycerol with no ash content, soot emissions are minimal and for an order of magnitude lower than for benchmark diesel fuel, as there are numerous phenomena effectively reducing their formation and increase their oxidation. The presented research confirms that utilization of bio-intermediates and waste-derived fuels in appropriate combustion setups can beside low CO2 footprint, feature also very low emissions of other pollutant species, providing that fuels feature high oxygen content, low ash content and low nitrogen content. With such approach it is possible to achieve clean combustion that is fully in line with circular economy guidelines.

Highlights

  • The research area of alternative fuels was previously heavily boosted by the first EU RED directive (European Union, 2009), which fostered innovation and implementation efforts in the EU as well as worldwide

  • As all experiments were carried out on the same experimental rig, the differences in emission concentrations can mainly be attributed to fuel physical and chemical properties and only to a minor extent to minimal changes that were implemented in the experimental setup to accommodate the use of different fuels

  • Emission concentrations are plotted vs. turbine inlet temperature (TIT) at different fuel temperatures

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The research area of alternative fuels was previously heavily boosted by the first EU RED directive (European Union, 2009), which fostered innovation and implementation efforts in the EU as well as worldwide. Within the first RED perspective, several commercial setups for biofuel production were put in function; they mostly relied on first-generation feedstock, where a significant market share was obtained with biodiesel (Ciriminna et al, 2014). In the first stage of the development process, they were capable of producing bio-intermediates, a mid-process product that required substantial upgrading before utilization as fuels (Xu et al, 2018). They were defined within RED as bioliquids (liquid fuels made from biomass for energy purposes other than transport). These are not suitable for transportation, low price and high maturity of technology make them a viable alternative for stationary power generation and for cogeneration (heating and cooling)

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.