Abstract

At present days building a structure with all the regular configurations is not feasible in most of the cases due to the irregular plot dimensions, aesthetic visual and functional requirements in the urban cities. The structure with more irregular configuration either horizontally or vertically are more vulnerable to earthquake & wind forces which leads to collapses of structure, property loss and casualties. Although a considerable amount of research effort was made on capturing the responses of irregular configuration structures under the earthquake forces, but well-accepted guidelines for multi storey irregular configuration structures are still yet to be framed. In this aspect a question might arise in the mind of structural engineers designing a high-rise structure i.e., which irregular configuration of structures and type of structures provide considerably good responses to the earthquake forces in reducing the damage caused by earthquakes and cost effective in implementing. A well-known answer is that shear walls provide good response to resist lateral forces when added to a structure.In the present study a structure with horizontal irregularity, vertical irregularity, Stiffness irregularity and Mass irregularity buildings with and without shear wall is considered and responses of the buildings are compared. Modeling of these 4 types of models with and without shear walls are done with ETABS software for G + 15 storey. The goal of the study is to compare model results like Stiffness, Displacement, Shear & Drift values and find out which model performs better. Vertical geometrical irregular building with shear wall has shown considerably better performance than other irregular buildings.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call