Abstract
This study compared the toxicological responses of Sprague–Dawley rats exposed nose-only to mainstream smoke (MS) from Test cigarettes (1, 2, and 3) to those of Control cigarettes without banded cigarette paper technologies (BCPT). Test cigarettes 1 and 2 had bands based on one technology (different band weight application) while Test cigarette 3 had bands based on another technology. The banded papers are representative of current marketed technologies. Rats were exposed to humidified HEPA filtered air (Sham) or to MS at concentrations of 0.06, 0.20, or 0.80 mg wet total particulate matter per liter air. Each exposure group contained 30 animals/sex (sentinel had 20 animals/sex). The study had two phases (13 weeks each): MS exposure (1 h/day, 5 days/week) and recovery without smoke exposure. Endpoints included clinical observations, respiratory physiology, hematology, serum chemistry, blood carboxyhemoglobin (COHb), serum nicotine, body/organ weights, gross pathology, and histopathology. Comparisons conducted were: Sham exposed vs. all cigarettes, Control cigarette vs. all Test cigarettes, and Test 1 vs. Test 2. Control and Test MS had comparable effects on respiratory physiology, COHb, serum nicotine, serum chemistry, and hematology. While some minor differences were observed, Control and Test MS had comparable effects on clinical signs, body/organ weights, and gross pathology/histopathology. Consequently, exposure of rats to equivalent MS concentrations from the four cigarettes induced similar toxicological responses in this study.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.