Comparation of EGFR-TKI (EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors) combination therapy and osimertinib for untreated EGFR-mutated advanced non-small cell lung cancers: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Abstract

EGFR-TKI (tyrosine kinase inhibitor) monotherapy has become the first-line treatment option for patients with EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Prolonging the survival time, improving the progression-free survival of front-line treatment, and delaying the occurrence of drug resistance. At present, combination therapy is being widely used. Evaluate the therapeutic effect of TKI joint and Osimertinib drug therapy for positive patients with gene positive. Articles that met the inclusion criteria were searched through electronic databases. treatment emergent adverse events were summarized, and progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated. Appropriate networks for different outcomes were created to incorporate all the evidence. Bayesian network-based multitreatment was used to compare the efficacy and specific toxicity of all treatment regimens. Fourteen eligible studies involving 2325 patients were included. Of these, 7 studies compared EGFR-TKI plus chemotherapy with EGFR-TKI alone, and 6 studies compared EGFR-TKI plus antiangiogenic therapy with EGFR-TKI alone. One study compared Osimertinib and GP, ER, EB, and GCP were more effective than SOC in PFS analysis; however, there was no significant difference between osimertinib and the other 4 combination regimens. The cumulative probabilities of being the most efficacious treatments were (PFS, OS, treatment emergent adverse events): O (73%, 16%, 0%, 0%), GCP (14%, 64%, 10%, 16%), GP (2%, 17%,8%), and EB (3%, 3%, 8%), ER (5%, NA, 4%);GA(1%, NA, 69%). Osimertinib has the lowest side effects and provides better PFS first-line treatment in advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC.GCP is the best regimen for OS, but its toxicity limits its application, and it may be the first choice for patients with higher survival requirements.