Comparación de medidas de poder dióptrico corneal y astigmatismo entre un topógrafo basado en tecnología de diodo-emisor de luz a color (Cassini®) y un topógrafo basado en tecnología Scheimpflug (Pentacam®)

Abstract

AimTo determine the agreement and to compare the measurements obtained from a colour light-emitting diode based (CassiniTM) and Scheimpflug (PentacamTM) based topography in the evaluation of the anterior, posterior, and total corneal power and astigmatism. MethodsA total of 30 eyes from 30 healthy patients were consecutively measured using PentacamTM and CassiniTM. The main evaluated parameters were the anterior, posterior, and total dioptric power, and a power vector analysis of the astigmatism. The agreement between both devices was analysed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and performing Bland-Altman plots. The comparison of means was performed using paired Student t-test. ResultsThe agreement between both devices when comparing the anterior and total corneal dioptric power was very high (ICC>0.85), but not when studying the posterior cornea (ICC<0.5). In the astigmatism analysis, measurements from the anterior cornea also showed an excellent agreement (ICC>0.78), but was poor for the corneal posterior surface (ICC<0.31). When studying the corneal dioptric power, no statistically significant differences were found for the anterior surface (P>.05), but PentacamTM obtained higher values for posterior and total surfaces (P<.001). As regards the magnitude of the astigmatism, no significant differences were found between both devices. ConclusionBoth devices were highly comparable when studying the anterior cornea, but the agreement was poor-moderate when measuring posterior cornea. Therefore, the data obtained by both topographers are not interchangeable.