Abstract
Two macaques, shown a series of pictures, recognized 79% and 85% upon re-presentation after 45 other pictures intervened. Human subjects working with the identical pictures (chosen to avoid human linguistic and experiential connotations) averaged 83% correctly recognized. The human false ‘recognition’ rates were lower than the macaques', hence tha average human accuracy was better, but the range of accuracy among the human subjects overlapped that of the macaques.
Full Text 
Sign-in/Register to access full text options
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Published version (
Free)
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
