Abstract

Ng and Bornstein (this issue) examined the comorbidity between dependent personality disorder (DPD) and anxiety disorders (ADs) via meta-analytic techniques. Although meta-analysis can be useful in quantifying such comorbid relationships, several conceptual and methodological concerns may undermine one's confidence in Ng and Bornstein's conclusions. Specifically, the bulk of the papers reviewed by Ng and Bornstein examined to what extent DPDs occurred in individuals with ADs, even though the authors' primary research question was the extent to which individuals with a diagnosis of DPD also have a diagnosis of AD. We argue that the inclusionary criteria used in their review may have underestimated the rate of comorbidity between DPDs and ADs. Future analyses may be improved by being theory-driven and by differentiating between clinical diagnoses versus sub-clinical symptomatology.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.