Abstract

PurposeThe extent of comorbidity and misdiagnosis had been unclear for patients with hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome (hEDS), a hereditary connective tissue disorder. The objectives of the study were to (1) describe the prevalence of alternative diagnoses that these patients have received, (2) assess their endorsement and rejection of these diagnoses, and (3) characterize their experience on their “diagnostic odysseys.” MethodsWe circulated a survey through the Ehlers-Danlos Society’s Global Registry, asking participants which diagnoses they had received and whether they believed they were still accurate. They were also asked questions about their experience while seeking a diagnosis. Descriptive statistics and consensus clustering were then conducted. ResultsA total of 505 unique individuals with clinically confirmed hEDS completed the survey. The average number of alternative diagnoses was 10.45. Anxiety, depression, and migraines were the most common. However, the diagnoses with the greatest endorsement were postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome, cervical instability, and mast cell activation syndrome. The diagnoses with the greatest rejection were functional neurologic disorders, multiple sclerosis, and fibromyalgia. The average time to diagnosis was 10.39 years. ConclusionAn appropriate hEDS diagnosis is complex and its presentation multisystemic. Health care providers should be aware of the specific phenotypes to improve the time to diagnosis and care.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.