Abstract

The goal was to identify the domain-general cognitive abilities and academic attitudes that are common and unique to reading and mathematics learning difficulties that in turn will have implications for intervention development. Across seventh and eighth grade, 315 (155 boys) adolescents (M age = 12.75 years) were administered intelligence, verbal short-term and working memory, and visuospatial memory, attention, and ability measures, along with measures of English and mathematics attitudes and mathematics anxiety. Teachers reported on students’ in-class attentive behavior. A combination of Bayesian and multi-level models revealed that intelligence and in-class attentive behavior were common predictors of reading accuracy, reading fluency, and mathematics achievement. Verbal short-term memory was more critical for reading accuracy and fluency, whereas spatial ability and mathematics self-efficacy were more critical for mathematics achievement. The combination of intelligence and in-class attentive behavior discriminated typically achieving students from students with comorbid (D = 2.44) or mathematics (D = 1.59) learning difficulties, whereas intelligence, visuospatial attention, and verbal short-term memory discriminated typically achieving students from students with reading disability (D = 1.08). The combination of in-class attentive behavior, verbal short-term memory, and mathematics self-efficacy discriminated students with mathematics difficulties from their peers with reading difficulties (D = 1.16). Given the consistent importance of in-class attentive behavior, we conducted post hoc follow-up analyses. The results suggested that students with poor in-class attentive behavior were disengaging from academic learning which in turn contributed to their risk of learning difficulties.

Highlights

  • Academic competencies at the end of secondary school contribute to individuals’ employability, wages, and the ability to pursue further education (Rivera-Batiz, 1992; Bynner, 1997; Ritchie and Bates, 2013; Stoet and Geary, 2020)

  • The current study provides a broad assessment of the domaingeneral cognitive, as well as the non-cognitive factors, that are common and unique to individual differences in reading and mathematics achievement and in the prediction of comorbid learning difficulties

  • The current study provided a comprehensive analysis of the common and unique predictors of individual differences in reading and mathematics achievement and learning difficulties in these domains

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Academic competencies at the end of secondary school contribute to individuals’ employability, wages, and the ability to pursue further education (Rivera-Batiz, 1992; Bynner, 1997; Ritchie and Bates, 2013; Stoet and Geary, 2020). Individual differences in academic achievement, achievement growth, and grade-point average are related to domain-general cognitive abilities (e.g., working memory; Geary et al, 2017; Peng et al, 2019) and to noncognitive factors, such as mathematics self-efficacy (Marsh and Yeung, 1998; Eccles and Wang, 2016; Semeraro et al, 2020). Even fewer studies have assessed the joint relations between domain-general cognitive abilities and non-cognitive factors and learning difficulties. We provided such an assessment for middle-school students and sought to determine the best combinations of domain-general cognitive and non-cognitive factors that characterize learning difficulties in mathematics, reading, and their comorbidity

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call