Abstract

Abstract Prominent urbanists have recently claimed that demographic trends and changing lifestyle preferences will generate population gains in communities whose built environments encourage non-automotive transportation. However, given increasing recognition of the frequent and often persistent appearance of population loss, we assess the converse: Do neighborhood-level affinities for alternative modes of transportation, which we term commuting culture, protect communities from population loss? Through an analysis of census tracts nested within the 50 largest metropolitan areas in the United States, we test whether increasing use of alternative modes is associated with (1) population change and (2) changing odds of population loss as a dichotomous outcome variable. We further examine the interaction between population density and commuter mode choice on population change 2000–2010. We find higher utilization of alternative modes of transportation have different effects, particularly when examined across density levels. We find that bus use and biking are associated with increased odds of population loss in all but the densest neighborhoods, where walking is associated with decreased odds of loss. Light rail utilization, on the contrary, insulates against loss regardless of tract density. These findings should be relevant for planners and place makers promoting accessibility-first programs of neighborhood renewal.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.