Abstract

Classic theories suggest that common pool resources are subject to overexploitation. Community-based resource management approaches may ameliorate tragedy of the commons effects. Here we use a randomized evaluation in Namibia’s communal rangelands to study a comprehensive four-year program to support community-based rangeland and cattle management. We find that the program led to persistent and large improvements for eight of thirteen indices of social and behavioral outcomes. Effects on rangeland health, cattle productivity and household economics, however, were either negative or nil. Positive impacts on community resource management may have been offset by communities’ inability to control grazing by non-participating herds and inhibited by an unresponsive rangeland sub-system. This juxtaposition, in which measurable improvements in community resource management did not translate into better outcomes for households or rangeland health, demonstrates the fragility of the causal pathway from program implementation to intended socioeconomic and environmental outcomes. It also points to challenges for improving climate change–adaptation strategies.

Highlights

  • Classic theories suggest that common pool resources are subject to overexploitation

  • Each Rangeland Intervention Areas (RIAs) comprised 5–15 Grazing Areas (GAs), communal rangeland parcels shared by 5–35 households

  • We find that an external intervention to support communitybased resource management generated substantial and persistent improvements in rangeland grazing management, community governance, and collective action

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Classic theories suggest that common pool resources are subject to overexploitation. Community-based resource management approaches may ameliorate tragedy of the commons effects. Positive impacts on community resource management may have been offset by communities’ inability to control grazing by non-participating herds and inhibited by an unresponsive rangeland sub-system This juxtaposition, in which measurable improvements in community resource management did not translate into better outcomes for households or rangeland health, demonstrates the fragility of the causal pathway from program implementation to intended socioeconomic and environmental outcomes. Elinor Ostrom and other critics of Hardin’s thesis have documented numerous communities that successfully developed local management systems to avoid overexploitation of commonly held resources, including rangelands[3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11] These findings have generated considerable enthusiasm for programs undertaken by governmental and non-governmental organizations that provide external support for holistic, community-based management of natural resources[2,12,13]. Climate change may increase the prevalence of drought and bush encroachment, which are already destabilizing rangeland ecosystems in the NCAs2,18

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call