Abstract

Human–elephant conflict (HEC) is a serious threat to elephants and can cause major economic losses. It is widely accepted that reduction of HEC will often require community-based methods for repelling elephants but there are few tests of such methods. We tested community-based crop-guarding methods with and without novel chili-based elephant deterrents and describe changes in farmers’ willingness to adopt these methods following our demonstration of their relative effectiveness. In three separate field-trials that took place over almost two years (October 2005 –May 2007) in two villages adjacent to Way Kambas National Park (WKNP) in Indonesia, we found that community-based crop-guarding was effective at keeping Asian elephants (Elephas maximus) out of crop fields in 91.2% (52 out of 57), 87.6% (156 out of 178), and 80.0% (16 out of 20) of attempted raids. Once the method had been shown to be effective at demonstration sites, farmers in 16 villages around WKNP voluntarily adopted it during the July 2008 to March 2009 period and were able to repel elephants in 73.9% (150 out of 203) of attempted raids, with seven villages repelling 100% of attempted raids. These 16 villages had all experienced high levels of HEC in the preceding years; e.g. they accounted for >97% of the 742 HEC incidents recorded for the entire park in 2006. Our work shows, therefore, that a simple evidence-based approach can facilitate significant reductions in HEC at the protected area scale.

Highlights

  • Species conservation will be more effective if it is based on good science and reliable evidence but too often this is not the case [1, 2]

  • The study was conducted around Way Kambas National Park (WKNP) in Lampung Province, Sumatra, Indonesia (Fig 1)

  • No data on whether elephant population size had changed between the 2002 survey and the Human–elephant conflict (HEC) mitigation work of 2006–2009 described in the present paper are available but we note that in other work we showed that crop raiding occurred along the park’s boundaries in areas adjacent to both high and low elephant density [11]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Species conservation will be more effective if it is based on good science and reliable evidence but too often this is not the case [1, 2]. While there is a growing appreciation of the dangers of making interventions without evidence of their effectiveness, this appreciation is growing too slowly and is failing to have sufficient impact on conservation practice, even for high profile species such as Asian elephants (Elephas maximus) and African elephants (Loxodonta africana) [3,4,5]. As Hall and Fleishman [6] argue, failure to evaluate under field conditions. Community-based human–elephant conflict mitigation analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call