Abstract

Living in a large social group is thought to increase disease risk in wild animal populations, but comparative studies have provided mixed support for this prediction. Here, we take a social network perspective to investigate whether patterns of social contact within groups influence parasite risk. Specifically, increased modularity (i.e. sub-grouping) in larger groups could offset the increased disease risk associated with living in a large group. We simulated the spread of a contagious pathogen in random social networks to generate theoretically grounded predictions concerning the relationship between social network connectivity and the success of socially transmitted pathogens. Simulations yielded the prediction that community modularity (Q) negatively impacts parasite success. No clear predictions emerged for a second network metric we considered, the eigenvector centralization index (C), as the relationship between this measure and parasite success depended on the transmission probability of parasites. We then tested the prediction that Q reduces parasite success in a phylogenetic comparative analysis of social network modularity and parasite richness across 19 primate species. Using a Bayesian implementation of phylogenetic generalized least squares and controlling for sampling effort, we found that primates living in larger groups exhibited higher Q, and as predicted by our simulations, higher Q was associated with lower richness of socially transmitted parasites. This suggests that increased modularity mediates the elevated risk of parasitism associated with living in larger groups, which could contribute to the inconsistent findings of empirical studies on the association between group size and parasite risk. Our results indicate that social networks may play a role in mediating pressure from socially transmitted parasites, particularly in large groups where opportunities for transmitting communicable diseases are abundant. We propose that parasite pressure in gregarious primates may have favored the evolution of behaviors that increase social network modularity, especially in large social groups.

Highlights

  • A fundamental goal of disease ecology is to identify host traits that influence parasitism in natural populations (Poulin 1995; Poulin and Morand 2004; Nunn and Altizer 2006)

  • At lower values of β, rapid extinction was extremely common in all networks, but the presence of central individuals in highly centralized networks drove the positive effect of C on R∞ by contributing to rare outbreaks

  • We combined theoretical and empirical approaches to investigate the links among group size, social network structure and parasitism in nonhuman primates

Read more

Summary

Introduction

A fundamental goal of disease ecology is to identify host traits that influence parasitism in natural populations (Poulin 1995; Poulin and Morand 2004; Nunn and Altizer 2006). While a number of other factors influence parasitism, including body mass, latitude and life history traits (Poulin and Morand 2004; Nunn and Altizer 2006), variation in social contact is expected to be a principle driver of variation in parasitism. The majority of studies investigating the effects of sociality on parasitism have focused on group size as the measure of sociality, with the expectation that larger groups provide increased opportunities for parasites to spread (Møller et al, 1993). In a meta-analysis of studies spanning insects, birds, and mammals, Côté and Poulin (1995) found an overall positive relationship between group size and the number of contagious parasites

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call