Abstract

In many jurisdictions around the world, community safety and crime prevention activity is supported by interagency committees. In the Australian state of New South Wales (NSW), local government Community Safety Officers (CSOs) lead, support or participate in a range of interagency and ‘whole of government’ networks, most of which were established to support central NSW state government crime prevention and community safety initiatives. Research was conducted with the aim of exploring the CSOs’ experience of the ‘whole of government’ partnerships established to support community safety and crime prevention in NSW.[i] The findings support international research which suggests that central-local partnerships are inhibited by different agendas, responsibilities and power dynamics across different levels of government. Some of the key contextual challenges for this work include concerns about costs shifting from State to local government and about shifting State government priorities; barriers to funding and to accessing crime (and other) data; and various administrative burdens. Consequently, we argued that there is a need for formal engagement and negotiation between, on the one hand, State government agencies that steer NSW crime prevention and, on the other, community safety policy initiatives and local government. Such engagement could help overcome the perception, indeed the reality, that shifting and dumping costs and responsibilities to local government is creating a range of burdens for CSOs. [i] The authors thank the NSW Local Government Community Safety and Crime Prevention Network and the individual local government CSOs who kindly assisted and contributed to this research.

Highlights

  • Interagency partnerships have become a key component of community safety and crime prevention initiatives in many jurisdictions (Gilling 2007; Hughes 2007)

  • Despite a legislative basis that supports councils developing strategies to be considered for endorsement as a Safer Community Compact (CPPR Act 1997), the State government has almost exclusively transitioned to the language of ‘crime prevention’, while the majority of councils who participated in previous research still frame position descriptions, strategic plans and advisory committees in the context of ‘community safety’ (Clancey et al 2012)

  • Research with Community Safety Officers (CSOs) in New South Wales (NSW) suggests a range of barriers to effective partnerships established to support local community safety and crime prevention in NSW

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Interagency partnerships have become a key component of community safety and crime prevention initiatives in many jurisdictions (Gilling 2007; Hughes 2007). Despite the growth since the 1990s in the range of local interagency partnerships established to support community and crime prevention initiatives in New South Wales (NSW), there has been little by way of research exploring the extent, nature and effectiveness of those partnerships. The establishment of CSO positions within local councils in NSW commenced in the 1980s, when two councils recruited CSOs to manage responsibilities under the State’s first local crime prevention pilot (Clancey et al 2012). Since there has been considerable growth in the number of councils that have established such positions to manage crime prevention and community safety at a local government level. In all instances this refers to officers recruited in a local government context, as opposed to CSOs in other jurisdictions around the world, such as the PCSOs (Police Community Support Officers) appointed by Police in the United Kingdom under the Police Reform Act 2002 (Johnson 2007)

Methods
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call