Abstract

Phylogenetic community structure can provide insight into the ecological dynamics that drive species co‐occurrence and community assembly patterns. Understanding these patterns is important for predicting future community composition in the context of climate change and other anthropogenic disturbances. However, we know little about how these environmental stressors might change interspecific interactions. Here we present an analysis on the role of putative foundation species (cushion‐type life forms) in determining the phylogenetic community composition of vascular plants at the local scale. We also investigated how community diversity and structure shifts across an environmental severity gradient. Abundance data for vascular plants was collected within and outside of four focal cushion plant species along an elevation gradient in Canadian alpine tundra. We compared differences in species‐specific abundance within plots with foundation plants to the same measure in adjacent open plots. Using a time‐calibrated molecular phylogeny, we quantified community structure metrics, including the net relatedness index (NRI), a novel net relatedness to focal index (NRFI), and an index of species co‐occurrence across the gradient. We examined the trends in these indices with cushion plant presence/absence and environmental severity using both linear regression and mixed effect models. We found that the loss of species richness at higher elevations was counterbalanced by a decrease in interspecific relatedness, maintaining phylogenetic diversity across the gradient. We found no evidence for community diversity or structure modifications by cushion plants, nor any evidence that species were preferentially associating with these hypothesized foundation species. On the contrary, many species had significantly negative co‐occurrence with the cushion plants. Overall, our results suggest that the cushion plant life forms may exhibit interspecific dynamics that are at least as competitive as they are facilitative. The decrease in phylogenetic clustering with elevation suggests that traits that allow persistence in these conditions are convergent at the local scale.

Highlights

  • Phylogenetic community structure can help in our understanding of how communities are formed and how they may be expected to change in the face of anthropogenic pressures such as land-use conversion, species invasions and global climate change (Cavender-Bares et al 2009)

  • It was not possible to separate out deviations from random co-occurrence that result from biotic interactions from those resulting from abiotic factors such as habitat preference

  • We examined the relationship between co-occurrence and phylogenetic distance to focal species, but again found no significant relationship

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Phylogenetic community structure can help in our understanding of how communities are formed and how they may be expected to change in the face of anthropogenic pressures such as land-use conversion, species invasions and global climate change (Cavender-Bares et al 2009). Several studies have demonstrated that cushion plants may reduce the effects of severe environmental conditions including temperature, moisture and wind stress as a result of their tightcanopied growth form (Korner and de Moraes 1979, Cavieres et al 2002, Reid and Lortie 2012). These life forms offer an ideal model system for the study of facilitative effects on community structure because it is easy to differentiate between within and outside cushion habitat

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call