Abstract

Lahars pose a significant risk to communities, particularly those living near snow-capped volcanoes. Flows of mud and debris, typically but not necessarily triggered by volcanic activity, can have huge impacts, such as those seen at Nevado Del Ruiz, Colombia, in 1985 which led to the loss of over 23,000 lives and destroyed an entire town. We surveyed communities around Mount Rainier, Washington, United States, where over 150,000 people are at risk from lahar impacts. We explored how factors including demographics, social effects such as perceptions of community preparedness, evacuation drills, and cognitive factors such as risk perception and self-efficacy relate to preparedness when living within or nearby a volcanic hazard zone. Key findings include: women have stronger intentions to prepare but see themselves as less prepared than men; those who neither live nor work in a lahar hazard zone were more likely to have an emergency kit and to see themselves as more prepared; those who will need help to evacuate see the risk as lower but feel less prepared; those who think their community and officials are more prepared feel more prepared themselves; and benefits of evacuation drills and testing evacuation routes including stronger intentions to evacuate using an encouraged method and higher self-efficacy. We make a number of recommendations based on these findings including the critical practice of regular evacuation drills and the importance of ongoing messaging that focuses on appropriate ways to evacuate as well as the careful recommendation for residents to identify alternative unofficial evacuation routes.

Highlights

  • Understanding people’s preparedness and intentions to prepare for natural hazard events is vital for building individual and community resilience

  • While Mount Rainier poses a number of typical volcanic hazards, this single volcano has a volume of snow and ice equivalent to all other volcanoes in the Cascade range combined

  • Through this survey we aimed to explore the influence of demographic differences (RQ1), social effects (RQ2), evacuation drills (RQ3), and cognitive factors (RQ4)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Background Understanding people’s preparedness and intentions to prepare for natural hazard events is vital for building individual and community resilience This is important in regions that experience low frequency high consequence events, where preparedness for such events may have less prominence in people’s day to day decision making. While Mount Rainier poses a number of typical volcanic hazards, this single volcano has a volume of snow and ice equivalent to all other volcanoes in the Cascade range combined. Lahars from this volcano which reach the Puget lowland occur every 500 to 1000 years (Fig. 1). Communities near Mount Rainier face other volcanic hazards, such as ashfall (see Fig. 3)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call