Community preferences in carbon reduction: Unveiling the importance of adaptive capacity for solid waste management

Abstract

In this study, we utilized the choice experiment (CE) method to evaluate the effectiveness of different solid waste management (SWM) programs in promoting adaptive capacity toward carbon reduction. We investigated three hypothetical scenarios for SWM programs, including the waste warriors program, carbon credits for waste reduction, and the carbon-trade SWM program. Our analysis unveiled distinct preferences among citizen groups regarding adaptive SWM programs. Incorporating nature-based solutions (NbS) within the study further enhances our understanding of the relationship between adaptive capacity and SWM. NbS approaches leverage natural processes and ecosystems to address environmental challenges, including climate impacts. By engaging citizens in comparing management options regarding climate impacts, our study fosters a greater understanding of the efficacy of different SWM approaches. Citizen participation plays a crucial role in identifying novel and innovative SWM solutions that effectively mitigate climate impacts. This collaborative involvement facilitates knowledge exchange, empowers communities, and strengthens adaptive capacity. The findings of our study offer valuable insights into SWM practices, policy development, and decision-making processes. By prioritizing adaptive SWM programs that align with citizen preferences and incorporating NbS principles, we can develop more effective strategies for carbon reduction.