Abstract

Background:Precision medicine seeks to better tailor medical care to the needs of individual patients, but there are challenges involved in communicating to patients, health care providers, and health system leaders about this novel and complex approach to research and clinical care. These challenges may be exacerbated for Alaska Native and American Indian (ANAI) people, whose experiences of unethical research practices have left some ANAI communities hesitant to engage in research that involves extensive data-sharing and diminished control over the terms of data management and who may have distinct, culturally-informed communication needs and preferences. There is need for communication research to support Tribal health organizations and ANAI people as they consider implementation of and participation in precision medicine. To address that need, this study characterizes the informational needs and communication preferences of patients, providers, and leaders at an Alaska Native Tribal health organization.Methods:We conducted 46 individual, semi-structured interviews to explore perspectives on precision medicine and related communication needs among patients, providers, and leaders of a Tribal health organization. Analysis involved team-based coding to identify a priori and emergent themes, followed by identification and recoding of content relevant to precision medicine informational needs and communication preferences.Results:Patients, providers, and leaders were described as both sources and recipients of information about precision medicine. Information deemed essential for making decisions about whether to participate in or implement a precision medicine program included information about the clinical and research applications of precision medicine, benefits and risks, health system costs and impacts, and data management practices. Preferred communication channels included digital and non-digital informational materials, as well as in-person learning opportunities for individuals and groups. Participants also describe contextual factors and barriers that influenced the acceptability and effectiveness of approaches to health communication.Conclusion:Results can inform approaches to communicating information about precision medicine to stakeholders within Tribal and other health care systems considering implementation of precision medicine in clinical or research contexts.

Highlights

  • Precision Medicine and Alaska Native and American Indian PeoplePrecision medicine is an “emerging approach for disease treatment and prevention that takes into account individual variability in genes, environment, and lifestyle for each person” (NIH, 2019a)

  • Interviews took place at facilities operated by Southcentral Foundation (SCF), a non-profit Tribal health organization headquartered in Anchorage, Alaska that provides a wide range of primary and specialty health care services to over 65,000 ANAI people

  • Much scholarship and research funding has been devoted to understanding how this objective might be achieved through approaches to research and clinical care that account for the role of genes, environment, and lifestyle in individual-level health, susceptibility to disease, and response to treatment

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Precision Medicine and Alaska Native and American Indian PeoplePrecision medicine is an “emerging approach for disease treatment and prevention that takes into account individual variability in genes, environment, and lifestyle for each person” (NIH, 2019a). Researchers and communities alike have raised concerns about the potential for precision medicine to undermine individual autonomy over personal health information, to expose individuals and communities to privacy risks and associated harms, and to exacerbate existing health disparities (Beskow et al, 2018; Jones et al, 2018; Stiles and Appelbaum, 2019) This tension between optimism and concern about the impacts of precision medicine is exacerbated for Alaska Native and American Indian (ANAI) people, for whom this emerging approach to clinical care and research simultaneously holds promise for addressing entrenched health disparities and is overshadowed by prior experiences of unethical research practices.

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.