Abstract
The implementation of the Law No. 6 of 2014 and the Village Fund in 2015 was able to encourage community participation in the entire development process starting from planning, implementation, supervision and utilization. This study aimes to analyze community participation in Megaluh Village by using an Islamic perspective. This study applied a case study approach to community participation and a literature review to determine community participation after the implementation of the Village Law from an Islamic economic perspective which are called maqhasid sharia. In general, Megaluh villages have shown active community participation in village development, but they still need to carry out long-term planning to ensure prosperity and this has not been observed during the study.
Highlights
Village has existed before the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia was formed
In 2010 the urban population had reached 49.79% of the total population in Indonesia. This means that there are 118 million people living in urban areas, and another 50.21% living in rural areas (Badan Pusat Statistik, 2010)
Concerning the development of Megaluh Village after the implementation of Law No 6 of 2014 and after the existence of the Village Fund in 2015, on Thursday 3 November 2016 Arifin (Head of Megaluh Village) said: "With this Village Fund, Megaluh village community is more active in planning the village development and implementing any village activities in an eagerly manner, because the implementation is done by Megaluh village people so there is a turnover of money in the village of Megaluh
Summary
Village has existed before the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia was formed. All state regulations regarding these areas will be related to the rights of origin of the area Their existence must be recognized and guaranteed for their survival in the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia. In 2010 the urban population had reached 49.79% of the total population in Indonesia. This means that there are 118 million people living in urban areas, and another 50.21% living in rural areas (Badan Pusat Statistik, 2010). Previous research by Green (2005), Baglioni (2015), Rasila (2013), and Permana (2013) revealed an increasing community involvement in development and the community had held important positions in policy making, namely: linked to the government
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
