Abstract

The Patient-Centered Medical Home (PCMH) model demonstrated that processes of care can be improved while unnecessary care, such as preventable emergency department utilization, can be reduced through better care coordination. A complementary model, the Integrated Primary Care and Community Support (I-PaCS) model, which integrates community health workers (CHWs) into primary care settings, functions beyond improved coordination of primary medical care to include management of the social determinants of health. However, the PCMH model puts downward pressure on the panel sizes of primary care providers, increasing the average fixed costs of care at the practice level. While the I-PaCS model layers an additional cost of the CHWs into the primary care cost structure, that additional costs is relatively small. The purpose of this study is to simulate the effects of the PCMH and I-PaCS models over a 3-year period to account for program initiation to maturity. The costs and cost offsets of the model were estimated at the clinic practice level. The studies which find the largest cost savings are for high-risk, paneled patients and therefore do not represent the effects of the PCMH model on moderate-utilizing patients or practice-level effects. We modeled a 12.6% decrease in the inpatient hospital, outpatient hospital and emergency department costs of high and moderate risk patients. The PCMH is expected to realize a 1.7% annual savings by year three while the I-PaCS program is expected to a 7.1% savings in the third year. The two models are complementary, the I-PaCS program enhancing the cost reduction capability of the PCMH.

Highlights

  • The seven principles defining the Patient-Centered Medical Home (PCMH) barely addresses the social determinants of health (SDH) which play a far greater role in health and premature mortality than does the health care system [1]

  • We assumed that the programs serve a Medicaid-managed care population that exists in New Mexico that is composed of 5% in the high risk/high cost category, 15% at moderate risk/ moderate cost, and the remaining 85% in good health at low risk/low cost

  • Most studies find the bulk of PCMH cost savings are for high-risk, high resource-utilizing patients, showing fewer effects of the PCMH model on patients with moderate risk and utilizing and those with little risk and utilization [6]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The seven principles defining the Patient-Centered Medical Home (PCMH) barely addresses the social determinants of health (SDH) which play a far greater role in health and premature mortality than does the health care system [1]. The PCMH has been widely promoted and recognized as a model for achieving effectiveness, equity and efficiency of care. The model demonstrates only a modest cost savings. Community health workers (CHWs) offer a path towards contextual and team-based care and a means of addressing the SDH. CHWs are culturally and linguistically competent individuals who usually live in the communities served and possess skills in addressing SDH. CHWs can be integrated into primary care practices either supporting the PCMH model or serving as a structural alternative to meet PCMH goals [2, 3]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call