Abstract
Community gardening involves physical transformation of land, which then promotes community-identity formation and the production of place. This is a case study of community gardens in Austin, Texas (USA) as different types of commons with a focus on the Diverse Economies framework's principles of the successful governance and management. This paper argues that community gardens represent biophysical, cultural, social, and knowledge commons, therefore, their success depends on the social value they provide in addition to their physical yield. This qualitative research uses key-informant interviews with community gardens' representatives to draw evidence that: 1) community gardens represent different types of commons and 2) the governance approaches and management of community gardens include the principles of ‘ethical action’ described by the Diverse Economies framework. This analysis shows that 18 out of 26 community gardens in Austin follow all six principles of ethical action, and the degree of use of these principles depends on the garden's purposes and values, socioeconomic profile of its members, and its management structure. The results also shows that community gardens in Austin appear to be less aware or less concern with the ecological services related to gardening.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.