Abstract

ABSTRACTCommunity action has an increasingly prominent role in the debates surrounding transitions to sustainability. Initiatives such as community energy projects, community gardens, local food networks and car sharing clubs provide new spaces for sustainable consumption, and combinations of technological and social innovations. These initiatives, which are often driven by social good rather than by pure monetary motives, have been conceptualised as grassroots innovations. Previous research in grassroots innovations has largely focused on conceptualising such initiatives and analysing their potential for replication and diffusion; there has been less research in the politics involved in these initiatives. We examine grassroots innovations as forms of political engagement that is different from the 1970s’ alternative technology movements. Through an analysis of community-run Energy Cafés in the United Kingdom, we argue that while present-day grassroots innovations appear less explicitly political than their predecessors, they can still represent a form of political participation. Through the analytical lens of material politics, we investigate how Energy Cafés engage in diverse – explicit and implicit, more or less conscious – forms of political engagement. In particular, their work to “demystify” clients’ energy bills can unravel into various forms of advocacy and engagement with energy technologies and practices in the home. Some Energy Café practices also make space for a needs-driven approach that acknowledges the embeddedness of energy in the household and wider society.

Highlights

  • Community action has an increasingly prominent role in the debates surrounding transitions to sustainability (e.g. Barr and Devine-Wright 2012, Aiken 2014). Initiatives such as community energy projects, community gardens, local food networks and car sharing clubs are examples of spaces for combinations of technological and social innovations (Seyfang and Smith 2007, Grimm et al 2013), addressing sustainability of systems such as food, energy and transport (Seyfang and Smith 2007). Such initiates have been conceptualised as grassroots innovations (Seyfang and Smith 2007), i.e. civil society-led initiatives that are often driven by social good, rather than by pure monetary motives

  • We investigate the issue of implicit politics in the context of community action related to fuel poverty

  • Our findings suggest that there are interesting politics in community energy projects, even when they may not form as a coherent political movement with shared visions as their earlier 1970s’ counterparts did

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Community action has an increasingly prominent role in the debates surrounding transitions to sustainability (e.g. Barr and Devine-Wright 2012, Aiken 2014). Barr and Devine-Wright 2012, Aiken 2014) Initiatives such as community energy projects, community gardens, local food networks and car sharing clubs are examples of spaces for combinations of technological and social innovations (Seyfang and Smith 2007, Grimm et al 2013), addressing sustainability of systems such as food, energy and transport (Seyfang and Smith 2007). As civil society-led initiatives, grassroots innovations involve different types of communities and organisational modes, such as cooperatives, local networks and charities (Seyfang et al 2013, Seyfang et al 2014) They utilise a mix of resources, practical knowledge, tacit skills and voluntary effort

Objectives
Findings
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.